Foreign Direct Investment and Foreign Portfolio Investment

Foreign direct investment (FDI) is cross-border investment through which an investor establishes a lasting interest and a significant degree of influence in an enterprise abroad. Foreign portfolio investment (FPI) is investment in tradable foreign securities primarily for financial return, without a comparable role in managing the enterprise. Thus, the central distinction is managerial influence and the durability of the investment relationship, not merely whether funds are invested in shares.

Nature and classification

• FDI creates a direct-investment relationship involving a lasting interest and significant influence over the enterprise’s management.
• FPI gives the investor a financial claim through securities but ordinarily no significant managerial influence.
• Balance-of-payments statistics generally use ownership of at least 10 per cent of an enterprise’s voting power as the benchmark for identifying a direct-investment relationship.
• The 10 per cent benchmark indicates significant influence for statistical classification; it does not necessarily imply majority ownership or full control.
• Portfolio investment covers cross-border holdings of equity and debt securities that are not classified as direct investment or reserve assets.

Forms and economic role

• FDI may occur through establishing a new enterprise, acquiring or expanding an existing enterprise, reinvested earnings, or financing between related enterprises.
• Greenfield FDI directly creates new productive capacity, while acquisition-based FDI initially transfers ownership of existing assets and may subsequently support expansion.
• FPI commonly takes the form of investment in shares, bonds and other tradable debt securities.
• FDI may bring capital together with technology, managerial practices, market access and long-term business linkages.
• FPI can broaden access to finance, improve market liquidity and support price discovery, but does not ordinarily involve an operating role in the investee enterprise.

Liquidity, stability and external-sector implications

• FDI is generally less liquid and more stable because it is tied to an enduring enterprise relationship and productive assets.
• FPI securities are more readily traded and repriced, making portfolio flows generally more sensitive to interest rates, risk perceptions and financial-market conditions.
• Abrupt portfolio inflows or outflows can transmit volatility to domestic asset prices and the exchange rate.
• FDI is not necessarily permanent: investors may sell their stake, repatriate earnings or reduce related financing.
• Both FDI and FPI are recorded as cross-border financial flows in the balance of payments and as external asset or liability positions in the international investment position.

How UPSC asks this