Inter-State Council under Article 263
SyllabusFederalism: nature, types and Union-State relations
An Inter-State Council is a forum through which governments can discuss shared concerns and improve coordination within India's federal system. Article 263 enables the President to establish such a Council and assign it duties concerning inter-State disputes, matters of common interest, and policy coordination.
Constitutional basis
Under Article 263, the President may establish an Inter-State Council if it appears that the public interests would be served by doing so. The President's order may define the nature of its duties, organisation and procedure.
- The provision is enabling, rather than a requirement that a Council must always exist.
- The Council's assigned responsibilities must be distinguished from the full range of functions that Article 263 permits.
Functions permitted under Article 263
Article 263 identifies three categories of duties that may be entrusted to the Council:
- Article 263(a) permits it to inquire into and advise upon disputes that may have arisen between States.
- Article 263(b) permits it to investigate and discuss subjects in which some or all States, or the Union and one or more States, have a common interest.
- Article 263(c) permits it to make recommendations upon any such subject, particularly recommendations for better coordination of policy and action concerning that subject.
Advisory role and the Council established in India
The Council is an advisory and consultative forum, not a court. Inquiring into a dispute and advising governments does not amount to issuing a binding judicial determination.
- Its dispute-related function under clause (a) specifically concerns disputes between States, whereas its common-interest function under clause (b) also covers Union-State concerns.
- The Inter-State Council established by Presidential Order in 1990, following the recommendation of the Sarkaria Commission, was assigned the discussion and coordination functions envisaged in clauses (b) and (c), rather than the dispute-inquiry function in clause (a).
- Its federal significance lies in enabling governments to exchange views and develop coordinated approaches while retaining their respective constitutional responsibilities.
Keep reading
The news behind topics like this, explained every day
Every day Gyaanam reads The Hindu, the Indian Express and PIB and picks what matters for UPSC. Each story is written up against the syllabus line it belongs to. Your first 7 days or 3 articles are free, whichever ends first.